Qui nous sommes

Volodalen est un organisme de formation et un laboratoire de recherche sur le mouvement, dédié aux Préférences® Motrices Naturelles. L’équipe Volodalen est composée de chercheurs, ingénieurs, formateurs, professionnels de la santé et du sport.

Nos ambassadeurs

Au niveau
PERFORMANCE

Ils sont tous au top mondial de leur sport. Ils ont fait ou font appel à l'expertise Volodalen pour leurs performances et/ou leur santé. Chaque année 200 sportifs professionnels dans 40 disciplines, au top de leur sport sont analysés, conseillés, suivis par Volodalen dans le respect de leurs préférences motrices.

Au niveau
SANTÉ

Chaque année 1500 professionnels de la santé (kinésithérapeutes, podologues, ostéopathes, médecins) et du sport (entraineurs, préparateurs physiques) se forment aux Préférences Motrices Naturelles par Volodalen. Merci pour votre confiance.

Trail – MM

N°1 ITRA

Équitation – BB

Swiss Jumping – 4 grands prix

Golf – JS

N°1 European Tour

Perche – AA

Final IAAF World Cup

BMX – SH

Championne du Monde

TRIATHLON - AB

World Triathlon Series

Tennis – FFT – UH

ATP 30

Longueur – JB

2nd Europe U20

Danse – BBL

Tournées mondiales

Ski Alpinisme – TD

Championne Olympique Jeunesse

Hockey – JK

Swiss National League

VTT – MM

2nd Word Cup Ranking

Football – FFF

3 clubs pros

Patinage artistique – GC

Swiss Elite

SKI NAUTIQUE - JC

2 World Ranking (+45 IWSF)

NATATION - HCC - SH

Europe U14-U16

1500m – HA

CIO Refugee Olympic Team

MOTOCROSS - JCM

4 victoires au Touquet

Escrime – RF

Word Champion

Et plus de 20 autres sports

Notre équipe

Cyrille Gindre

Formateur et Chercheur

Barbara Warpelin

Administratif

Thibault Lussiana

Formateur et Chercheur

Aurélien Patoz

Ingénieur et Chercheur

Bastiaan Breine

Chercheur

Audrey Chaperon

Coach

Jonathan Vanden Abeele

Formateur et Coach

Eloise Pavlik

Physiothérapeute

PUBLICATIONS VOLODALEN

Leader mondial des recherches scientifiques sur les préférences motrices naturelles, Volodalen vous propose une liste de publications scientifiques et tout public de son cru.

Concurrent endurance training with either plyometric or dynamic body-weight training both improve running economy with minimal or no changes in running biomechanics. Sports Biomech 2023; 2200403

Accurate estimation of peak vertical ground reaction force using the duty factor in level treadmill running. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2023; 33; 169-177

Comparison of different machine learning models to enhance sacral acceleration-based estimations of running stride temporal variables and peak vertical ground reaction force. Sports Biomech 2023; 2159870

Using statistical parametric mapping to assess the association of duty factor and step frequency on running kinetic Front Physiol 2022; 13;1044363

Duty factor and foot‐strike pattern do not represent similar running pattern at the individual level. Sci. Rep. 2022; 12; 13061

Examination of running pattern consistency across speeds. Sports Biomech 2022; 4; 1-15

PIMP your stride: preferred running form to guide individualized injury rehabilitation. Front Rehabilit Sci 2022; 3; 880483

The Nike Vaporfly 4%: a game changer to improve performance without biomechanical explanation yet. Footwear Sci 2022; 2077844

Non‐South East Asians have a better running economy and different anthropometrics and biomechanics than South East Asians. Sci. Rep. 2022; 12; 6291

A single sacral-mounted inertial measurement unit to estimate peak vertical ground reaction force, contact time, and flight time in running. Sensors 2022; 22; 784

There is no global running pattern more economic than another at endurance running speeds. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2022; ijspp.2021-0345

A multivariate polynomial regression to reconstruct ground contact and flight times based on a sine wave model for vertical ground reaction force and measured effective timings. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021; 9; 687951

A novel kinematic detection of foot-strike and toe-off events during non instrumented treadmill running to estimate contact time. J Biomech 2021; 128; 110737

The effect of natural preferences on serving biomechanics: a new approach to the motor skills of tennis players. Int Tennis Fed Coach Review 2021; 84; 15-17

Estimating effective contact and flight times using a sacral-mounted inertial measurement unit. J Biomech 2021; 127; 110667

Different plantar flexors neuromuscular and mechanical characteristics depending on the preferred running form. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2021; 59; 102568

Both a single sacral marker and the whole-body center of mass accurately estimate peak vertical ground reaction force in running. Gait Posture 2021; 89; 186-192

Does Characterizing Global Running Pattern Help to Prescribe Individualized Strength Training in Recreational Runners? Front Physiol 2021; fphys.2021.631637

Predicting temporal gait kinematics: anthropometric characteristics and global running pattern matter. Front Physiol 2021; fphys.2020.625557

Terrien ou aérien c'est le corps qui choisit ! AEFA 2020; 238: 10-18

Footstrike pattern at the 10 km and 39 km points of the Singapore marathon in recreational runners. Footwear Sci 2020; 13(1); 43-53

Duty factor reflects lower limb kinematics of running. Appl Sci 2020; 10(24); 8818

Duty factor is a viable measure to classify spontaneous running forms. Sports 2019; 7(11); 233

Intra and inter-rater reliability of the Volodalen® scale to assess Aerial and Terrestrial running forms. J Athl Enhanc 2019; 8(2); 1-6

Recognition of foot strike pattern in asian recreational runners. Sports 2019; 7(6); 147

The implications of time on the ground on running economy: less is not always better. J Exp Biol 2019; 222(6); jeb192047

Motor preferences in running and quiet standing. Sci Sports 2018; 33(5); e249-e252

Do subjective assessments of running patterns reflect objective parameters? Eur J Sport Sci 2017; 17(7): 847-857

Similar running economy with different running patterns along the Aerial-Terrestrial continuum. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2017; 12: 481-489

Coquins de ressorts. Zatopek 2016; 39: 48-52

Feel your stride and find your preferred running speed. Biol Open 2016; 5: 45-48

Etes-vous terrien ou aérien ? Sport et Vie 2016; 156: 14-23

Salut les terriens, salut les aériens ! Zatopek 2016; 38 : 22-23

Aerial and Terrestrial patterns: A novel approach to analyzing human running. Int J Sports Med 2016; 37: 25–29

Courir à la mode. Zatopek 2016; 38: 18-21

Les meilleurs façons de courir. Zatopek 2016; 36: 16-18

Terrien et Aérien: concept, validation et implications 2016; Thèse en sciences du sport

En 2 temps 3 mouvements. Zatopek 2014; 31: 14-15

Quelle foulée pour le trailer ? Trail Endurance Mag 2012; -: 12-17

Etes-vous un 'terrien' ou un 'aérien' ? Zatopek 2010; 14: 22-24

La meilleure façon de courir... Sport et Vie 2008; HS 29: 62-69